Photo Manipulation and ethnics

1.
A: This story is about photographers that used photo shop or other editing resources to change their pictures.
They changed the was things looked in the photos that were very important.But they don't ever change things that aren't visible in the photo. For example, they change object dates and times and replace people in the photo with other people.


B: This is not acceptable editing for a photographer working for a newspaper. It's just disrespectful to all of their readers to lie and deceive them from the truth . I would like to read a story and look at the picture that shows me the truth as a reader.You also just loos respect for those who just don't have any integrity. So bottom line this type of photo editing is completely unethical.

 
2
A: I think that this photo is the most unethical. Because it's telling a FLAT OUT LIE. Some unethical photos just twist the truth and what's really there. But this photo is taking two totally different extremely important people and putting them together to make a good story. I mean it's the president. This isn't subject you can just screw around with.

        B:  explain why you think it is not as bad as others.  I believe this  photo is least unethical because because the only reason the photo shopped this photo was to make the cover look more interesting. It's not as bad as the others because they aren't lying those two pyramids are something that are really there. they just tweaked it. And they didn't do it with dad motives like the last photo. I wasn't used to prove a fake story really happened.